Post by account_disabled on Mar 16, 2024 5:53:39 GMT 1
The new political course that begins in September seems to have as one of the axes of action the fundamental issue of the centrality of work as a backbone of the economic and social reconstruction after the Covid- crisis and the achievement of a paradigm of stable employment as a condition of maintaining it. One of the star issues in this sense continues to be the legal treatment of the so-called “riders” or home delivery food delivery workers at the service of digital platforms. On this issue, a non-legal proposal has been registered in Congress, for debate in the Labor Commission, in which the government is requested to urgently send a bill that consolidates the majority judicial doctrine that upholds the full employment of this category of workers. The text of this Proposition is very expressive of the political discourse that seems to have gained strength after the summer, in the return to the political debate that will culminate in the approval of this year's general budgets.
The text of this proposal is transcribed below, the content of which has not been received by the media , more attentive to other news that they have deemed to be of greater interest. Recently, numerous rulings have been issued that recognize the labor nature of the relationship that unites so-called riders with the platforms for which they provide services. The reasons and concepts that the courts present in their AOL Email List rulings to rule against these platforms and in favor of the employment relationship are set out below. The organization of work is one of the fundamental aspects in this group for situations of abuse to occur, given that this employment relationship does not respond to a classic pattern.
The riders depend % on the company's app to do their work, and the entire day of these workers is at the disposal of the business and the platform. It is the company that tells the delivery person when he can work, how much he can earn and where he can do it, so in no case can the riders be considered self-employed: they completely lack any decision-making power over their own work. Rights that in many cases are violated without any opposition, taking advantage of the situation of need of precarious workers who cannot afford to reject outright the working conditions offered to them. Another of the characteristic notes of the employment relationship would be dependency, in contrast to the concept of autonomy in the provision: delivery workers do not have the autonomy that they should have as self-employed workers. This autonomy must be considered in the sense of business management power, for example, the relationship with suppliers, price.
The text of this proposal is transcribed below, the content of which has not been received by the media , more attentive to other news that they have deemed to be of greater interest. Recently, numerous rulings have been issued that recognize the labor nature of the relationship that unites so-called riders with the platforms for which they provide services. The reasons and concepts that the courts present in their AOL Email List rulings to rule against these platforms and in favor of the employment relationship are set out below. The organization of work is one of the fundamental aspects in this group for situations of abuse to occur, given that this employment relationship does not respond to a classic pattern.
The riders depend % on the company's app to do their work, and the entire day of these workers is at the disposal of the business and the platform. It is the company that tells the delivery person when he can work, how much he can earn and where he can do it, so in no case can the riders be considered self-employed: they completely lack any decision-making power over their own work. Rights that in many cases are violated without any opposition, taking advantage of the situation of need of precarious workers who cannot afford to reject outright the working conditions offered to them. Another of the characteristic notes of the employment relationship would be dependency, in contrast to the concept of autonomy in the provision: delivery workers do not have the autonomy that they should have as self-employed workers. This autonomy must be considered in the sense of business management power, for example, the relationship with suppliers, price.